The print edition of Entertainment Weekly has a story about Manos: The Hand of Fate, possibly the worst movie ever made. Netflix carries the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version, which is unbelievably rated 4 stars since it features a horrible movie.
Has anyone seen this movie? Do you have a movie you think is really the worst movie ever made?

Yes, I have seen Manos: Hands of Fate. It is an exceptionally poor, grade-Z horror film, but I have seen movies just as bad if not worse. I think any number of Bela Lugosi flicks (The Devil Bat, White Zombie) are just as bad. At least Manos is pretty funny and not just tedious like the ones I mention above. My vote for worst movie might have to go to The Last Movie with Dennis Hopper.
Posted by: Chris Perry | June 09, 2005 at 01:39 AM
Another one just came to me that probably tops all of these: Orgy of the Dead by Ed Wood. In all seriousness, it's basically an hour and a half of a guy sitting on a throne cackling while scantily clad women dance around.
Posted by: Chris Perry | June 09, 2005 at 01:40 AM
The 'Bride Of Frank' and 'Robovampire' are the worst movies I've seen.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 03:18 AM
IMDb Bottom 100
http://us.imdb.com/chart/bottom
A little background on Manos:
http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20040806.html
Yes I saw it. Yes it was the worst I've seen.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 03:47 AM
It is the worst movie I've ever seen, yet it is totally worth a viewing.
Posted by: AG | June 09, 2005 at 08:54 AM
I've seen Manos, it was bad, and yet, watchable. In my opinion there are two types of 'bad' films: Ones that are bad, but fun to watch (like Manos, Resident Evil, Blair Witch 2) and ones that are bad and not fun to watch (Star Wars Christmas Special, Master of Disguise).
Posted by: John Resig | June 09, 2005 at 09:09 AM
Yes. It is the worst film I have ever seen.
But the MST3K version is a true gem. I am not surprised at the 4 -star rating.
Posted by: eli | June 09, 2005 at 09:12 AM
Wild Wild West, dear god that was bad.
Posted by: Mike M | June 09, 2005 at 09:45 AM
I have recently seen the MST3K version (from netflix) I even have the torgo screen saver ;-) I can't even imagine sitting through this without the MST3K gang on the bottom of the screen. Beloved with Oprah is the worst trying to be serious movie I have ever seen. 3 hours of hell on earth. There are plenty of so bad its good movies we can all laugh at trying to be serious. This one is a so bad its bad.
Posted by: Joe D. | June 09, 2005 at 10:38 AM
Liquid Sky? Attack of the killer tomatoes? Battlefield Earth? These are all bad.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 11:10 AM
Robot Jox. Pretty horrid.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 11:30 AM
Kangaroo Jack
Runners Up:
Magnolia
The Thin Red Line
Beloved
Godfather 3
Posted by: Carl | June 09, 2005 at 12:18 PM
Solaris, very slightly better than Manos but a nice runner up.
Posted by: CaT | June 09, 2005 at 01:21 PM
Battlefield Earth, hands down. Just horrible...and it was *trying* to be good.
Absolutely, positively disagree with both Attack of the Killer Tomatoes and Magnolia as bad...but that's just me. Both are gems in my book. Tomatoes is campy fun, and Magnolia is just beautiful in many ways.
Posted by: Tony | June 09, 2005 at 01:50 PM
The reason the Netflix rating for MST3K is 4 stars for an awful film is the skewering it gets.
Manos is special for so many reasons. I personally love it for the Frank Zappa-esque bad guy and the fact that it looks like it was filmed on an old fashioned home movie camera.
Posted by: Jeff Ray | June 09, 2005 at 02:48 PM
For me it would be "End of the World"
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0075990/#comment
Posted by: PlungeBob | June 09, 2005 at 02:54 PM
Hard to say. For the fifteen minutes I was awake, it was pretty bad.
Posted by: SAP | June 09, 2005 at 04:38 PM
The Net (1995) was the worst movie ever made. I could only watch the first 10 minutes of that movie. Oh - that is bad!
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 04:42 PM
The Scorpion King. This movie was bad in and of itself, and this from a person who loved both the Mummy movies and all the other summer blockbuster nonsense that comes out every year. The DVD includes deleted scenes - they cut the ENTIRE plot. Battlefield Earth was nearly as bad but Travolta's character saved it. LXG was bad but only b/c it had potential.
Posted by: Rob Emmerich | June 09, 2005 at 05:29 PM
Manos in MST3K is highly worth it.
Worst movie I ever saw... Battlefield Earth is right up there. Plan 9 is really unwatchable also. I am the biggest movie snob I know and I just can't get most of the movies listed above into the painfully-bad category.
Posted by: Steven Hoober | June 09, 2005 at 05:33 PM
My vote goes for POSSESSION (1981), directed by Andrzej Zulawski, starring Isabelle Adjani and Sam Neill. Watch actors rocking back and forth in rocking chairs, turning around in office chairs, pacing to and fro through rooms, walking through empty city streets in broad daylight, throwing random unmotivated fits in empty subway stations during the day, repeating the same stupid actions again and again and again. I had to finish it at double speed after about 53 minutes. I wish I hadn't bothered. What a steaming pile of crap. It makes Ed Wood like Scorsese or Francis Ford Coppolla.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 05:40 PM
Most of the James Bond movies with Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan, "Licence to Kill", "Casino Royale", "Batman" and "Batman Returns", "Mars Attacks!", "Sleepy Hollow", "Big Fish", "The Shawshank Redemption", "The Green Mile", both the "Kill Bill" movies, "Pulp fiction", "Reservoir Dogs", "Jackie Brown", "True Romance", any cartoons by Pixar or Disney, anything by Merchant-Ivory, any period drama, any zombie movie, any Tom Clancy or John Grisham movie... The list is endless. Basically, pick a popular movie and it's likely to be utter garbage designed to please the masses, who are stupid and easy to please. "Men in Black" 1 & 2.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 06:08 PM
Anything produced by Don Simpson or Jerry Bruckheimer. Anything directed by Michael Bay, Tony/Ridley Scott, Dominic Sena, Paul Verhoeven, James Cameron, Steven Spielberg, and other no-talent hacks. Anything starring Tom Cruise, Colin Farrell, Wesley Snipes, Nicolas Cage, John Cusack, Robert De Niro, Robert Duvall, and other over-rated actors. Studio pictures generally suck.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 06:20 PM
How about some votes for worst movie-making, as opposed to whose haircuts you don't like or movies you didn't have patience for because they weren't in your favorite genre? "Worst" and "Least favorite" are two different things.
Posted by: Chris Perry | June 09, 2005 at 06:26 PM
I have nothing against their haircut or particular genre. I just think they are over-rated actors that have nothing more than good looks, a distinctive voice, and charisma. Far too often, people become massive celebrities that are nothing more than a body and a voice, or they will go to great lengths to change their appearance - witness weight loss/gain by Christian Bale, Matt Damon, Edward Norton, Robert De Niro, Hilary Swank, all second-rate actors... They're so desperate to get roles, they starve themselves almost to death and exercise to adrenal failure... Poster children for superficial method acitng.
Posted by: | June 09, 2005 at 09:34 PM