The Writers Side of the Strike
There is an interesting video that explains the writer's side of the strike:
I wonder why the studios haven't produced a video to explain their side of things (oh, wait -- all of the writers are on strike).
Click here for more information about this Website and a full disclosure statement.
Investors: Please do not use the information on this site to buy or sell stocks. I don't want to have to explain to your spouse how you lost a huge amount of money based on advice from a site called "Hacking Netflix."
The contents of this Web site are (c) 2003 - 2007 Briki Media, LLC. All rights reserved.
« Post Office Closed Today to Honor Veterans | Main | Netflix vs. iTunes vs. Amazon - Heroes »
There is an interesting video that explains the writer's side of the strike:
I wonder why the studios haven't produced a video to explain their side of things (oh, wait -- all of the writers are on strike).
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1bb69e200e54f8161df8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Writers Side of the Strike:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I have no love for the studios, but was really underwhelmed by the arguments the writers make in this video.
They whine about not getting any money from re-runs of I Love Lucy, but that just points out the absurdity of such long copyright terms; 50 year old TV shows should be in the public domain. Were any of those original ILL writers counting on getting a payout 50-years later? And how many are still alive and working in the WGA to collect it?
Also the kind of terms they want for Internet viewings would be a major barrier to innovation, IMHO. But maybe, if we're lucky, the WGA strike will accelerate transformation of the entertainment business, along the lines described here: http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/11/rebuilding-holl.html
We can only hope.
Posted by: Hunter McDaniel | November 13, 2007 at 11:50 AM
I found the argument compelling.
And, the reason that the studios haven't made a video is quite simple, I think, they come off as unreasonable greedheads if they did make such a video.
Like the MPAA.org home page looks unreasonable, presenting downloaders as just this side of pedophilic clergy.
The studios had a record breaking year at a projected 40 billion, and they are grousing about, what, another 6 to 8 cents on the dollar?
With BSG, a hugely profitable franchise, NBC refused to share penny one for even one of the showings of the webisodes - even though they carried revenue generating advertisements.
As to copyrights, it was an example of historic disequity that writers have experienced - not a desire for residuals on a series that is now in the public domain. Once no one is making money on the show, then nobody is ( except those $5 a disc collections ).
Interestingly, putting I Love Lucy on studio DVDs has had the effect of copyrighting those cleaned up version forever. Encrypted on DVD means that it is forever protected by DMCA enforcement.
There is an old joke, about the oh so dim starlet who slept with a screenwriter, thinking that it would advance her career.
I'd suggest reading William Goldman's _Adventures in the Screen Trade_ written many years ago, if you want to understand what it means to have the creative sweat of your brow discounted as something anyone can do.
Posted by: WeaselBuddha | November 13, 2007 at 07:08 PM