Tristan Louis at TNL.net compared hit movie availablility at Netflix, Amazon, iTunes, Vudu and DVD.
The past year has seen an increasing alignment in the libraries of titles offered by online streamers in an on-demand basis. At the same time, we have seen Netflix apparently abandon its strategy of offering popular movies on a subscription basis. Next week, I will look at whether Netflix’s efforts are getting more focused on television streams or whether we are seeing them pull back across the board in terms of availability of more recent content.
We are also seeing Hollywood now treating online as more equivalent to DVD sales, offering titles for sale online at roughly the same rate as they do on DVD. Let’s hope that this trend continues to hold and that the industry sees the wisdom of providing online streams in an earlier release window. A few independent movies have done simultaneous releases online and in theaters this year and Hollywood has a potential to increase its revenues if it were to increasingly go in that direction.
That guy is functionally retarded. He's comparing PPV (3.99+ per movie per day) to netflix streaming (8 bucks a month).
Posted by: WakkaWakka | January 19, 2012 at 01:47 AM
The problem being she is comparing Netflix's "free" or subscription selection vs. AMZN/iTunes rental purchase selection.
What I want to know is how does Netflix's subscription selection stack up against AMZN free Prime selection.
Also, what is the rental /purchase price for the AMZN/iTunes movies.
Posted by: momo | January 19, 2012 at 03:12 AM
I've compared menus: At Ruth's Chris Steak House they offer a Filet Mignon, while at McDonald's they only serve a quarter-pound hamburger!
Posted by: Billy | January 19, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Offering the movies online is not the equivalent to selling me the actual BD disc.
As far as attempting to get me to pay 6 to 10 bucks for a streamed film they are sadly mistaken. Not gonna happen.
Posted by: eviltimes | January 19, 2012 at 10:53 AM
What everybody else already said. The internet may be limitless, but that article is still waste of space.
Posted by: Robert Emmerich | January 19, 2012 at 02:59 PM
As others have stated, the article is pretty useless...comparing apples to oranges
Posted by: FearNo1 | January 20, 2012 at 02:32 AM
Thanks for the comments. You saved me from having to read the article.
Posted by: Judy_ | January 22, 2012 at 12:56 PM